Skip to main content

Samantha Brounstein

Hidden Bias is such an interesting concept because it is undeniable. It was really great to learn how young we are when we are introduced to them, though I wish I could say it was at all surprising but we are a culture of identifying “the other” and making sure to separate “us” from “them” at all costs. I liked that the article actually goes over the definitions of biased and stereotypes, they truly are such a present concept in everyones lives yet sometimes we get caught up in the connotation of every word instead of the denotations. 

But tests like the one that was offered by Project Implicit was incredibly over simplistic. 
I took three tests and of course it showed me to be biased in some way or another because bias isn’t something that you have or don’t have, it is something that everyone has just depending on “side”. The tests felt more pavlovian with them training my hands to associate words together only to switch it up attempting to try and get me to “show my true inner bias”.

-Where did they come up with the idea to test hidden bias using word association and hand eye coordination?
-How does my participation in the study validate the creation of the test in the end?

I found the tests fun, they were also informative, it was also good to see the questions at the conclusion of the test in which they ask if you disagree with your results and I didn’t rebuke them for the most part, and it was beneficial to see where my results stood against others but again, it was all over simplistic and more about training your hands and making sure that your brain was not confused at any point. I had fun and it was indeed informative but I would take the tests with a grain of salt in knowing what the results were even though it is a universal truth that we all have a bias. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rachel Tibbetts - What a Riot

Schutzman starts off this reflection with an excerpt from the play she created. The opening lines serve to give recognition and context to the subject matter by immediately dedicating the show to Rosa Parks. This is an extremely effective strategy to introduce the tone and subject matter of the piece. The addition of Claudette at the end was the “icing on the cake” to the introductory excerpt. Raising questions and therefore instantly opening up a dialogue. Schutzman approached the students by asking questions while also letting them choose the person/people they wanted to learn about and also depict in the play. I think entering a school with something to teach is the idealistic approach to interacting with students; when students are in class they are expecting to be taught and ask questions. This is the exact approach Shutzman used. This allowed her to familiarize herself with the student community and find their interests, question...
Post a Comment
Read more

Katharine Means What a Riot! Response

In 2005 Mady Shutzman was invited by CalArts CAP to write a play for the teenage participants Plaza de la Raza arts center in East Los Angeles to perform. At first I was intrigued by this, as my limited knowledge of Boal and Theatre of the Oppressed techniques has been around the participatory games, activities, and techniques used to build community. I know some about Forum and Legislative Theatre, but had little conception of what a TO play would look like. Shutzman's piece, UPSET! , was modeled using Boal's Joker System. There is a character called the Joker who probes the characters and audience during the play with the "ultimate goal to raise questions, offer multiple points of view, and encourage dialogue". Shutzman used this form as a "means to incorporate the teens curiosity, dismay, outrage, confusion, fear, and inspiration in relation to the subject matter of the play within the play." The teens decided upon Rodney King and Claudette Colvin (a youn...
Post a Comment
Read more