Skip to main content

Maternity Leave



Currently in the United States, the only federal law guaranteeing maternity leave in the U.S. is unpaid, and it only applies to some employees. “Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), will protect jobs for up to 12 weeks after childbirth or adoption.” The law states that your job be waiting when parents return and ensures that parents cannot be penalized for taking time off. Citizens are eligible for coverage only if they’ve been working in a job for a year and the employer has more than 50 employees within 75 miles of where employee works. Under FMLA, men are also eligible for 12 weeks of unpaid leave to care for a child. Some employers may offer additional paternity leave as well.

     Maternity laws also vary by state. For example, “California, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island operate programs that require private-sector employers to pay their employees who utilize maternity leave at partial replacement rates.” In New York extra paid family leave legislation passed. Starting off at 8 weeks and 50% of pay in 2018; then extending to 12 weeks and 67% of pay in 2021. Maternity leave has already proved to increase the financial success of a parent and their child. In New Jersey, “women who took paid leave in the year after giving birth were 40% less likely to receive public aid or food stamps.”

These numbers pale in comparison to leave given around the world. The top five countries who give the highest maternity leave are Bulgaria, Greece, United Kingdom, Slovakia, and Croatia. Bulgaria being the highest ranking country, giving 59 weeks of paid maternity leave, Croatia giving 30 weeks of paid leave and the United States comes in last giving the least amount of time with only 12 weeks. In Finland, "New mothers are entitled to up to three years of paid leave. Norwegian mothers receive up to 91 weeks. The U.K. receives  39 weeks, while citizens in the Canadian north get one year."



-       https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/19/news/economy/countries-most-maternity-leave/index.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rachel Tibbetts - What a Riot

Schutzman starts off this reflection with an excerpt from the play she created. The opening lines serve to give recognition and context to the subject matter by immediately dedicating the show to Rosa Parks. This is an extremely effective strategy to introduce the tone and subject matter of the piece. The addition of Claudette at the end was the “icing on the cake” to the introductory excerpt. Raising questions and therefore instantly opening up a dialogue. Schutzman approached the students by asking questions while also letting them choose the person/people they wanted to learn about and also depict in the play. I think entering a school with something to teach is the idealistic approach to interacting with students; when students are in class they are expecting to be taught and ask questions. This is the exact approach Shutzman used. This allowed her to familiarize herself with the student community and find their interests, question...

Katharine Means What a Riot! Response

In 2005 Mady Shutzman was invited by CalArts CAP to write a play for the teenage participants Plaza de la Raza arts center in East Los Angeles to perform. At first I was intrigued by this, as my limited knowledge of Boal and Theatre of the Oppressed techniques has been around the participatory games, activities, and techniques used to build community. I know some about Forum and Legislative Theatre, but had little conception of what a TO play would look like. Shutzman's piece, UPSET! , was modeled using Boal's Joker System. There is a character called the Joker who probes the characters and audience during the play with the "ultimate goal to raise questions, offer multiple points of view, and encourage dialogue". Shutzman used this form as a "means to incorporate the teens curiosity, dismay, outrage, confusion, fear, and inspiration in relation to the subject matter of the play within the play." The teens decided upon Rodney King and Claudette Colvin (a youn...