Skip to main content
1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project?
- The pointing out of the media's negative portrayal of "Teenagers".

2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project?
- The issues that effects the teenagers who are participating on this project: sex, violence, values, family, school and the future.

3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content?
- Interactive theater piece

4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that invested in the process and 
outcomes of project?
- The teenagers like Leukessia Spencer, who felt the needs of their voice to be heard, to make a statement.

5. AUDIENCE: For whom was this project conceived? 
- The adults who came to see the event to not interact but "listen" to the young teenagers

6. ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES: How were the stakeholders, audiences, and others engaged/connected to the project?
- The stakeholders, the performers were given a freedom of speech, the protection for being lectured and looked down upon. They were able to say their ideas without the fear of judgement. The adults were able to truly listen to the young voices; not filtered through media, but from the teenagers themselves.

7. GOAL: What are this project's objectives?
- The up-bringing of teenage voice. The launch of a new program "Media Literacy" to point out the buried social flaw that is forming "Problem" that the teenagers are facing.

8. VALUES: What were the project's guiding values or core beliefs? How were they expressed in the process?
- They parked cars on a rooftop and let them discus topics about their daily life and the exposure they are open to that forms their supposed future, which eventually will educate the audience.

9. RESOURCES: What tangible and intangible resources were used to pursue the project's goals?
- Cars, Roof of a parking lot, teenagers, topics to talk about

10: OUTCOMES: What were the results of this project? 
- The audience's experience of bending over and listening to the teenagers.
- The coverage by the mainstream media, the very media they were criticizing; the response that told the production team that they were heard.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CalArts Garden

The reason why I choose this topic is that I know a lot of students are complaining that CalArts is too plain. It is just one main building with a small campus. I would like to design a space for the CalArts campus where students and teachers can work together as a community and taking care of the plants. The community can hold a farmers market, season food festival or food-related artwork competition.    Few things I read about the benefits of school garden:   -  Gardens create opportunities for students to work cooperatively and to take on responsibilities.  - Gardens provide unique opportunities for cross-generational connections.  - Students learn to focus and patience, cooperation, teamwork, and social skills.  -Combining language arts and gardening activities brings a hands-on element to a subject normally taught lecture-style, providing inspiration and motivation for students who struggle to focus in traditional cl...

Tuition meeting

Speaking point: We have spent over 60 thousand dollars on this school so far, we have tolerated the raise each year. At some point we do not have more money to give and we are pushed out along with all of our debt including interest. With this false start we lack the motivation to attend another school in the future, therefore leaving us uneducated and in debt. Other than the knowledge gained, this would be a waste of two years of my life and in fact sets me back in my career.

Rachel Tibbetts - What a Riot

Schutzman starts off this reflection with an excerpt from the play she created. The opening lines serve to give recognition and context to the subject matter by immediately dedicating the show to Rosa Parks. This is an extremely effective strategy to introduce the tone and subject matter of the piece. The addition of Claudette at the end was the “icing on the cake” to the introductory excerpt. Raising questions and therefore instantly opening up a dialogue. Schutzman approached the students by asking questions while also letting them choose the person/people they wanted to learn about and also depict in the play. I think entering a school with something to teach is the idealistic approach to interacting with students; when students are in class they are expecting to be taught and ask questions. This is the exact approach Shutzman used. This allowed her to familiarize herself with the student community and find their interests, question...