Skip to main content

Week 2 Hidden Bias Reflection


Something that interested me about the reading and my subsequent bias testing was the idea of the perpetuation of bias and its relationship with consciousness. It is clear that bias is perpetuated by most systems in society (most predominantly pop culture and media) and reflect a preference for the dominant discourse which is white, heterosexual, and male. However, something that may have come into play with my bias testing and others was 1) the consciousness that we’re being tested but also 2) the awareness that I didn’t want to fall into the expected rut of having a preference for the white, heterosexual, and male. That being true, my test-taking was imbued with a sense of caution and need for precision that wouldn’t have otherwise been there had this test been presented to me in a different way. There is a sort of counter-revolution in liberal communities like CalArts where the in-group is being actively redefined, and I think my proximity to that made me self-conscious of what my bias would probably be. I wouldn’t say I took active measures to steer my results in a different direction but I definitely knew why certain questions were being asked and what would indicate a certain preference over another. Because of this element of bias consciousness, I question the efficacy of what the test sets out to do. However, I do believe it was very effective at getting me to explore within myself where my biases live, and how I’d prefer to adjust them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rachel Tibbetts - What a Riot

Schutzman starts off this reflection with an excerpt from the play she created. The opening lines serve to give recognition and context to the subject matter by immediately dedicating the show to Rosa Parks. This is an extremely effective strategy to introduce the tone and subject matter of the piece. The addition of Claudette at the end was the “icing on the cake” to the introductory excerpt. Raising questions and therefore instantly opening up a dialogue. Schutzman approached the students by asking questions while also letting them choose the person/people they wanted to learn about and also depict in the play. I think entering a school with something to teach is the idealistic approach to interacting with students; when students are in class they are expecting to be taught and ask questions. This is the exact approach Shutzman used. This allowed her to familiarize herself with the student community and find their interests, question...

Katharine Means What a Riot! Response

In 2005 Mady Shutzman was invited by CalArts CAP to write a play for the teenage participants Plaza de la Raza arts center in East Los Angeles to perform. At first I was intrigued by this, as my limited knowledge of Boal and Theatre of the Oppressed techniques has been around the participatory games, activities, and techniques used to build community. I know some about Forum and Legislative Theatre, but had little conception of what a TO play would look like. Shutzman's piece, UPSET! , was modeled using Boal's Joker System. There is a character called the Joker who probes the characters and audience during the play with the "ultimate goal to raise questions, offer multiple points of view, and encourage dialogue". Shutzman used this form as a "means to incorporate the teens curiosity, dismay, outrage, confusion, fear, and inspiration in relation to the subject matter of the play within the play." The teens decided upon Rodney King and Claudette Colvin (a youn...