Skip to main content

Macy Rupp Hidden Bias Response

I took the gender bias and racial bias test and was incredibly interested in the response.  While I like to think that I’m moving along in my journey of unlearning preconceived notions about people regarding their gender or race, I was prepared to hear that I have hidden biases.  However I was surprised when most of the gender tests revealed that I am neutral in regards to men and women. While I’m not happy to admit it, I was expecting a lean towards women but was happily surprised to see a neutral result.  While I think these hidden bias tests are fun, engaging, and are a great starting off point for conversation and self work, I think there is something about institutionalized isms that a computer can’t quite understand.

I also am confused and interested in the quality of questions that were asked. I was curious as to why they would ask a few times whether or not you had a racial bias, for example, and then continue to ask about whether you preferred black people to white people. Again, while I believe this can be a helpful starting point, I'm curious what the solution is for after you take the test. Knowing your hidden biases is of course great if you have the want to fix these biases, which I do, however where do you go with your hidden biases after you take the test?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rachel Tibbetts - What a Riot

Schutzman starts off this reflection with an excerpt from the play she created. The opening lines serve to give recognition and context to the subject matter by immediately dedicating the show to Rosa Parks. This is an extremely effective strategy to introduce the tone and subject matter of the piece. The addition of Claudette at the end was the “icing on the cake” to the introductory excerpt. Raising questions and therefore instantly opening up a dialogue. Schutzman approached the students by asking questions while also letting them choose the person/people they wanted to learn about and also depict in the play. I think entering a school with something to teach is the idealistic approach to interacting with students; when students are in class they are expecting to be taught and ask questions. This is the exact approach Shutzman used. This allowed her to familiarize herself with the student community and find their interests, question...

Katharine Means What a Riot! Response

In 2005 Mady Shutzman was invited by CalArts CAP to write a play for the teenage participants Plaza de la Raza arts center in East Los Angeles to perform. At first I was intrigued by this, as my limited knowledge of Boal and Theatre of the Oppressed techniques has been around the participatory games, activities, and techniques used to build community. I know some about Forum and Legislative Theatre, but had little conception of what a TO play would look like. Shutzman's piece, UPSET! , was modeled using Boal's Joker System. There is a character called the Joker who probes the characters and audience during the play with the "ultimate goal to raise questions, offer multiple points of view, and encourage dialogue". Shutzman used this form as a "means to incorporate the teens curiosity, dismay, outrage, confusion, fear, and inspiration in relation to the subject matter of the play within the play." The teens decided upon Rodney King and Claudette Colvin (a youn...