Skip to main content

Elizabeth Waller- Hidden Bias, Stereotypes


-What are some examples of positive stereotypes? Negative stereotypes limit and generalize the people to which they are assigned. Might positive stereotypes have the same limiting capabilities for people who fall outside of the positive stereotypes? For example, if someone doesn’t meet the general positive expectation for their type (e.g., “all women are nurturing”) they might be seen as a failure or have the validity of their identity questioned by someone who can’t see beyond the stereotype. A stereotype is a predetermined film of judgement that is applied to someone based on superficial qualities. How can we see each other honestly if we’re already applying judgement, even if it’s a positive judgement?

-It is important for us to understand our own biases so that we can understand what biases we unconsciously pass on to others (children, etc.).

-In the hidden bias tests, a lot of the questions were oversimplified and didn’t account for the nuance of the issues. For example, one question in the race bias test said that Irish, Italian, and Jewish people all had bias against them and worked their way out of it. The question was of how much we agree with the statement that black people should do they same. The way this question is posed doesn’t account for the fact that these groups of people have all faced very different types and levels of bias. The legal and societal structures that are in place affect these groups and their ability to “work their way out” of discrimination very differently. Anyone who claims that oppressed groups “just need to work harder” doesn’t understand how our systems are purposefully set up to hold some groups in powerlessness. Furthermore, the assumption that oppressed people need to “work their way out” of oppression puts the focus and responsibility in the wrong place. It should be the oppressor’s job to stop oppressing, not the oppressed person’s job to work through or around that.

-Many of the sex/career bias test questions were similarly limited. One asked, “During your youth, who was your primary caregiver?” The response options were binary (mother/father), with no option for both. My parents traded off staying home from work to take care of me when I was little. My dad was a stay-at-home dad for a while. My mom was a stay-at-home mom for a while. My parents shared my caregiving equally and it would be inaccurate to choose one as a “primary caregiver”. There was an option for “N/A (I did not have a primary caregiver)”, but in a test that specifically focuses on sex, I feel it’s important to note that both my mother and father were involved in my caretaking.

-With the timed word association tests, I wonder how the order of the key assignments affected my response time and my results. After the first set of associations, I got used to the key assignments. I had to relearn the key assignments and change my muscle memory for the following sets. Would my results have been different if the keys were assigned in a different order?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CalArts Garden

The reason why I choose this topic is that I know a lot of students are complaining that CalArts is too plain. It is just one main building with a small campus. I would like to design a space for the CalArts campus where students and teachers can work together as a community and taking care of the plants. The community can hold a farmers market, season food festival or food-related artwork competition.    Few things I read about the benefits of school garden:   -  Gardens create opportunities for students to work cooperatively and to take on responsibilities.  - Gardens provide unique opportunities for cross-generational connections.  - Students learn to focus and patience, cooperation, teamwork, and social skills.  -Combining language arts and gardening activities brings a hands-on element to a subject normally taught lecture-style, providing inspiration and motivation for students who struggle to focus in traditional cl...

Katharine Means What a Riot! Response

In 2005 Mady Shutzman was invited by CalArts CAP to write a play for the teenage participants Plaza de la Raza arts center in East Los Angeles to perform. At first I was intrigued by this, as my limited knowledge of Boal and Theatre of the Oppressed techniques has been around the participatory games, activities, and techniques used to build community. I know some about Forum and Legislative Theatre, but had little conception of what a TO play would look like. Shutzman's piece, UPSET! , was modeled using Boal's Joker System. There is a character called the Joker who probes the characters and audience during the play with the "ultimate goal to raise questions, offer multiple points of view, and encourage dialogue". Shutzman used this form as a "means to incorporate the teens curiosity, dismay, outrage, confusion, fear, and inspiration in relation to the subject matter of the play within the play." The teens decided upon Rodney King and Claudette Colvin (a youn...

What a Riot!

What strategies did she employ in her process of making in play with the youth? Some of the strategies Mady Schutzman employed in her process of making a play with the youth were, utilizing the Joker System, presenting exercises to create a “safe” space by opening the floor and space to the youth to speak, reflect, and share their stories. What approaches resonated with you? Many of the approaches that were used were very intriguing and interesting, but there was one approach that resonated with me. Particularly, the questions that came out of one of the approaches. In the vein of the Joker System, it was designed to ,”promote social inquiry and personal agency by asking questions (How do I know what I know? Who authored the historical narratives we reiterate? Are those stories relevant to me and my community? Who do they privilege and who do they marginalize?” Mandy shared. These questions resonated with me because they are questions I have been asking myself this...